Reported by Joerg Reisenweber, Sep 8, 2014
from proto_V0 I see GSM antenna C-springs are ~1mm closer to PCB edge than on M900 PCB. This not necessarily introduces problems, but should nevertheless get checked and adjusted
Comment 1 by Nikolaus Schaller, Sep 8, 2014
Duplicate with #518? Please check if this is not yet fixed in the latest available version2-wip (http://projects.goldelico.com/p/neo900/downloads/60/) since you mention "proto_V0". There have been fixes in between. See also: http://projects.goldelico.com/p/neo900/issues/518/
Comment 2 by Joerg Reisenweber, Sep 11, 2014
sorry, typo. GPS C-springs that is. Next to USB, labeled X6201 X6202 in N900 docs. Checked in GTA04b7V1.brd and the pads still end at edge of PCB while they should have a ~0.5mm distance, and thus the C-springs should be mounted a fraction of a millimeter further towards PCB center
Comment 3 by Nikolaus Schaller, Sep 24, 2014
It is still unclear if this is a real issue. The pads as defined in EAGLE are indeed bigger and the Gerber's show them going to the edges. But thePCB manufacturer does not make them go exactly to the edge. The reason is that they are defined a little bigger than needed so that soldering is improved. But then, the inner edge (closer to the camera hole) should be at the right location. IMHO, this can only be verified if the next protoype gets them placed wrongly or not.